Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 5517 55C8 (IS 5517:1993) and BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
IS 5517 55C8 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, IS 5517 55C8 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20 is a 82.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 5517 55C8
BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20
Tensile Strength
700-850 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength (0.2% proof)
460 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
>=15%
Not specified
Hardness (annealed)
<=220 HB
Not specified
Condition
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 63 mm
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 5517 55C8
Not documented
BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20
Used for nuts, bolts, hydraulic fittings, precision turned parts, sleeves, and couplings.
Key Differences
IS 5517 55C8 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20.
Can IS 5517 55C8 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20?
IS 5517 55C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 5517 55C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20?
IS 5517 55C8 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20.
Can IS 5517 55C8 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20?
IS 5517 55C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 080A20 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.