Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo (IS 6911:1992) and ASTM A959 SS316 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo is typically used for stainless and heat-resisting steel plate, sheet and strip (clause 1.1), while ASTM A959 SS316 is commonly used for marine, chemical, pharmaceutical, food processing equipment.
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while ASTM A959 SS316 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo vs ASTM A959 SS316 is a 72.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo
ASTM A959 SS316
Hardness (annealed, max)
285 HBS
Not specified
Hardness (quenched and tempered, min)
660 HV, 58 HRC
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo
Stainless and heat-resisting steel plate, sheet and strip (clause 1.1)
Can IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo Be Substituted With ASTM A959 SS316?
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo and ASTM A959 SS316 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo and ASTM A959 SS316?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo be substituted with ASTM A959 SS316?
IS 6911 X108Cr17Mo and ASTM A959 SS316 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.