Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4053 SNCM220 (JIS G4053:2008) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4053 SNCM220 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4053 SNCM220 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is a 56.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4053 SNCM220
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Tensile Strength
930 MPa min
Not specified
Yield Strength
785 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
12% min
Not specified
Hardness
269-331 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4053 SNCM220
Nickel-chromium-molybdenum case-hardening (carburizing) steel; automotive bearings, drive shafts, gears, and components requiring high wear resistance with impact-resistant core
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Not documented
Key Differences
JIS G4053 SNCM220 specifies P, S, Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can JIS G4053 SNCM220 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
JIS G4053 SNCM220 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4053 SNCM220 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
JIS G4053 SNCM220 specifies P, S, Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can JIS G4053 SNCM220 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
JIS G4053 SNCM220 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.