Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4102 SNC415 (JIS G 4102:1979) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4102 SNC415 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4102 SNC415 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is a 62.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4102 SNC415
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Tensile Strength
≥830 MPa
Not specified
Case Hardness HRC
58–62
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4102 SNC415
Heavily loaded gears, cams, camshafts
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
JIS G4102 SNC415 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 specifies Mo which is not specified for JIS G4102 SNC415.
Can JIS G4102 SNC415 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
JIS G4102 SNC415 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4102 SNC415 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
JIS G4102 SNC415 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6. IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 specifies Mo which is not specified for JIS G4102 SNC415.
Can JIS G4102 SNC415 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
JIS G4102 SNC415 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.