Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4103 SNCM439 (JIS G4103:1979) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4103 SNCM439 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4103 SNCM439 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 61.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4103 SNCM439
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Tensile Strength
≥980 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
≥835 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥12%
Not specified
Hardness
293–352 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4103 SNCM439
Crankshafts, gears, heavy duty shafts, aircraft components
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
JIS G4103 SNCM439 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can JIS G4103 SNCM439 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
JIS G4103 SNCM439 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4103 SNCM439 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
JIS G4103 SNCM439 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can JIS G4103 SNCM439 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
JIS G4103 SNCM439 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.