Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4105 SCM435 (JIS G4105:1979) and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4105 SCM435 is typically used for gears, shafts, high tensile bolts, while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
JIS G4105 SCM435 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G4105 SCM435 vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 59% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4105 SCM435
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
≥830 MPa
850-1050 MPa
Yield Strength
≥685 MPa
685 MPa min
Elongation
≥15%
11% min
Hardness
248–302 HB
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
JIS G4105 SCM435
Gears, shafts, high tensile bolts
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
JIS G4105 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Ni which is not specified for JIS G4105 SCM435.
Can JIS G4105 SCM435 Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4105 SCM435 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4105 SCM435 and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4105 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A. GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Ni which is not specified for JIS G4105 SCM435.
Can JIS G4105 SCM435 be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4105 SCM435 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.