Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4202 SACM645 (JIS G 4202:2005) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4202 SACM645 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4202 SACM645 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 56.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4202 SACM645
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Tensile Strength
930–1080 MPa
410-590 MPa
Surface Hardness HV
≥900 (nitrided)
Not specified
Core Hardness HB
269–321
Not specified
Yield Strength
Not specified
245 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
>=18%
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
JIS G4202 SACM645 specifies Al which is not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10.
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni which is not specified for JIS G4202 SACM645.
Can JIS G4202 SACM645 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
JIS G4202 SACM645 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4202 SACM645 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
JIS G4202 SACM645 specifies Al which is not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10. IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni which is not specified for JIS G4202 SACM645.
Can JIS G4202 SACM645 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
JIS G4202 SACM645 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.