Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4304 SUS305 (JIS G4304:2021) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4304 SUS305 is typically used for hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips, while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
JIS G4304 SUS305 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G4304 SUS305 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 75.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 33.3%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4304 SUS305
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
>=480 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=175 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
>=40%
≥40%
Hardness
<=187 HB
Not specified
Condition
Solution heat treated plate and strip; 0.2 percent proof strength applies only when specified by the purchaser
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4304 SUS305
Hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Can JIS G4304 SUS305 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
JIS G4304 SUS305 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4304 SUS305 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can JIS G4304 SUS305 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
JIS G4304 SUS305 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.