Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4304 SUS430 (JIS G4304:2021) and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4304 SUS430 is typically used for hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips, while GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is commonly used for furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications.
JIS G4304 SUS430 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G4304 SUS430 vs GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is a 66.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4304 SUS430
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Tensile Strength
>=420 MPa
≥510 MPa
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa
≥196 MPa
Elongation
>=22%
≥35%
Hardness
<=183 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed plate and strip; proof strength applies only when specified by the purchaser
Not specified
Max Service Temp
Not specified
1050°C
Typical Applications
JIS G4304 SUS430
Hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications
Key Differences
JIS G4304 SUS430 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can JIS G4304 SUS430 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
JIS G4304 SUS430 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4304 SUS430 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
JIS G4304 SUS430 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can JIS G4304 SUS430 be substituted with GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
JIS G4304 SUS430 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.