Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4305 SUS420J2 (JIS G4305:2012) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4305 SUS420J2 is typically used for cold-rolled stainless steel plates, sheet and strip, while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
JIS G4305 SUS420J2 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G4305 SUS420J2 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 62.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4305 SUS420J2
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
>=540 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=225 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
>=18%
≥40%
Hardness
<=235 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed plate and strip; proof strength applies only when specified by the purchaser
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4305 SUS420J2
Cold-rolled stainless steel plates, sheet and strip
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Can JIS G4305 SUS420J2 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
JIS G4305 SUS420J2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4305 SUS420J2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can JIS G4305 SUS420J2 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
JIS G4305 SUS420J2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.