Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4404 SKD1 (JIS G4404:2006) and EN ISO 4957 1.2316 (EN ISO 4957:2018) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
JIS G4404 SKD1 is typically used for cold forming dies, bending dies, while EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is commonly used for plastic injection moulds for corrosive materials, food packaging moulds.
JIS G4404 SKD1 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4404 SKD1 vs EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is a 58% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4404 SKD1
EN ISO 4957 1.2316
Hardness HRC (hardened)
58-64
38–44
Hardness HB (annealed)
<=269
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
28–34 (pre-hardened)
Corrosion Resistance
Not specified
Good in humid/corrosive environments
Typical Applications
JIS G4404 SKD1
Cold forming dies, bending dies
EN ISO 4957 1.2316
Plastic injection moulds for corrosive materials, food packaging moulds
Key Differences
EN ISO 4957 1.2316 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for JIS G4404 SKD1.
Can JIS G4404 SKD1 Be Substituted With EN ISO 4957 1.2316?
JIS G4404 SKD1 and EN ISO 4957 1.2316 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4404 SKD1 and EN ISO 4957 1.2316?
EN ISO 4957 1.2316 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for JIS G4404 SKD1.
Can JIS G4404 SKD1 be substituted with EN ISO 4957 1.2316?
JIS G4404 SKD1 and EN ISO 4957 1.2316 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.