Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4404 SKD11 (JIS G4404:2006) and DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 (DIN 17200:1986) are both steel grades.
JIS G4404 SKD11 is classified under Tool & Die Steels, while DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
JIS G4404 SKD11 is typically used for precision blanking dies, cold forming tools, gauges, while DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is commonly used for power generation components, rotors, turbine parts.
JIS G4404 SKD11 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4404 SKD11 vs DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is a 67.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Power generation components, rotors, turbine parts
Key Differences
Different category: JIS G4404 SKD11 is Tool & Die Steels, DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is Alloy Steel.
JIS G4404 SKD11 specifies Si which is not specified for DIN 17200 30CrMoV9.
Can JIS G4404 SKD11 Be Substituted With DIN 17200 30CrMoV9?
JIS G4404 SKD11 and DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4404 SKD11 and DIN 17200 30CrMoV9?
Different category: JIS G4404 SKD11 is Tool & Die Steels, DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is Alloy Steel. JIS G4404 SKD11 specifies Si which is not specified for DIN 17200 30CrMoV9.
Can JIS G4404 SKD11 be substituted with DIN 17200 30CrMoV9?
JIS G4404 SKD11 and DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.