Minimal Match — 52% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4801 SUP9A (JIS G 4801:2005) and EN 10089 50CrV4 (EN 10089:2002) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
JIS G4801 SUP9A is typically used for heavy duty leaf springs, torsion bars, while EN 10089 50CrV4 is commonly used for valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools.
JIS G4801 SUP9A is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN 10089 50CrV4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4801 SUP9A vs EN 10089 50CrV4 is a 78.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 52%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4801 SUP9A
EN 10089 50CrV4
Tensile Strength
≥1180 MPa
1100–1300 MPa
Yield Strength
≥1030 MPa
≥1000 MPa
Elongation
≥7%
≥8%
Hardness
Not specified
321–375 HB
Typical Applications
JIS G4801 SUP9A
Heavy duty leaf springs, torsion bars
EN 10089 50CrV4
Valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools
Key Differences
JIS G4801 SUP9A specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4.
EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies V which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP9A.
Can JIS G4801 SUP9A Be Substituted With EN 10089 50CrV4?
JIS G4801 SUP9A and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4801 SUP9A and EN 10089 50CrV4?
JIS G4801 SUP9A specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4. EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies V which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP9A.
Can JIS G4801 SUP9A be substituted with EN 10089 50CrV4?
JIS G4801 SUP9A and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.