Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-552 35CD4 (NF A35-552:1986) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-552 35CD4 is typically used for gears, shafts, axles, connecting rods, high strength bolts, automotive parts, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
NF A35-552 35CD4 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-552 35CD4 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 65.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 15%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
NF A35-552 35CD4
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
850-1000 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
>=650 MPa
400-600 MPa
Elongation
>=14%
10-14 %
Hardness
248-302 HB
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
NF A35-552 35CD4
gears, shafts, axles, connecting rods, high strength bolts, automotive parts
NF A35-552 35CD4 specifies Mo which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can NF A35-552 35CD4 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
NF A35-552 35CD4 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-552 35CD4 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
NF A35-552 35CD4 specifies Mo which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can NF A35-552 35CD4 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
NF A35-552 35CD4 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.