Related Material — 58.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-565 18NCD4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-565 18NCD4 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-565 18NCD4 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is a 58.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 58.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
NF A35-565 18NCD4
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Tensile Strength
850-1100 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
650-850 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
10-16%
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Typical Applications
NF A35-565 18NCD4
Used for gears, aerospace shafts, pinions, transmission components, heavy-duty bearings, and carburized mechanical parts.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
NF A35-565 18NCD4 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6.
Can NF A35-565 18NCD4 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
NF A35-565 18NCD4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-565 18NCD4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
NF A35-565 18NCD4 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6.
Can NF A35-565 18NCD4 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
NF A35-565 18NCD4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.