Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
SAE J404 52100 (SAE J404:2009) and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
SAE J404 52100 is typically used for ball bearings, roller bearings, races, bushings, precision tooling, dies, gauges, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
SAE J404 52100 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, SAE J404 52100 vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 58.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
SAE J404 52100
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
Not specified
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=310 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=18%
Condition
Not specified
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Cu, Mo which are not specified for SAE J404 52100.
Can SAE J404 52100 Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
SAE J404 52100 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between SAE J404 52100 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Cu, Mo which are not specified for SAE J404 52100.
Can SAE J404 52100 be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
SAE J404 52100 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.