Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 (IS 11169 (Part 1):2022) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 is typically used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components, while IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is commonly used for cold heading and cold extrusion of parts that are case hardened; the standard covers bars, wire rods and wires of 2 to 100 mm (clause 1.1, annex b).
UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy, while IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, UNI 11234 100Cr6 vs IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is a 63% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Cold heading and cold extrusion of parts that are case hardened; the standard covers bars, wire rods and wires of 2 to 100 mm (clause 1.1, Annex B)
Key Differences
IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can UNI 11234 100Cr6 Be Substituted With IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
UNI 11234 100Cr6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between UNI 11234 100Cr6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can UNI 11234 100Cr6 be substituted with IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
UNI 11234 100Cr6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.