Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AISI 1045 and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
AISI 1045 is typically used for shafts, gears, axles, bolts, machine parts, while BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 is commonly used for as-rolled, or as-rolled and softened, steel (section two).
AISI 1045 is defined under AISI, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, AISI 1045 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 is a 85.7% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AISI 1045
BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04
Condition
Hot Rolled
Not specified
Tensile Strength
570-700 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
310-450 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
16-20%
Not specified
Hardness
170-210 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
AISI 1045
Shafts, gears, axles, bolts, machine parts
BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04
As-rolled, or as-rolled and softened, steel (section two)
Key Differences
AISI 1045 specifies S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04.
Can AISI 1045 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
AISI 1045 and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AISI 1045 and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
AISI 1045 specifies S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04.
Can AISI 1045 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
AISI 1045 and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.