Related Material — 57.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AISI 1060 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
AISI 1060 is typically used for used for springs, blades, hand tools, wear parts, shafts, and cutting tools., while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
AISI 1060 is defined under AISI, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, AISI 1060 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is a 85.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 57.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AISI 1060
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Condition
Hot Rolled
Case hardened, 19 mm test bar
Tensile Strength
700-750 MPa
430 MPa min
Yield Strength
380-420 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
11-16%
18 % min
Hardness
197-220 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
AISI 1060
Used for springs, blades, hand tools, wear parts, shafts, and cutting tools.
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
AISI 1060 specifies P, S which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can AISI 1060 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
AISI 1060 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AISI 1060 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
AISI 1060 specifies P, S which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can AISI 1060 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
AISI 1060 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.