Related Material — 66.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 (AS/NZS 1594:2025) and AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 (AS/NZS 3678:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 is typically used for automotive structural parts, trailers, agricultural equipment, general fabrication, light structural sections., while AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, crane booms, mining machinery, earthmoving equipment, structural columns..
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 1594 HA350 vs AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 is a 100% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 66.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AS/NZS 1594 HA350
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400
Yield Strength
350 MPa min (AS/NZS 1594)
400 MPa min (t<=12mm)
Tensile Strength
Not specified
~520 MPa min (approx, equivalent to ASTM A572 Gr.60)
Can AS/NZS 1594 HA350 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400?
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can AS/NZS 1594 HA350 be substituted with AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400?
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.