Related Material — 60.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 (AS/NZS 1594:2025) and ASTM A572 Grade 50 (ASTM A572) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 is typically used for automotive structural parts, trailers, agricultural equipment, general fabrication, light structural sections., while ASTM A572 Grade 50 is commonly used for high-strength low-alloy structural steel; buildings, bridges, transmission towers, construction equipment, general structural fabrication.
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while ASTM A572 Grade 50 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 1594 HA350 vs ASTM A572 Grade 50 is a 90.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 60.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
High-strength low-alloy structural steel; buildings, bridges, transmission towers, construction equipment, general structural fabrication
Key Differences
ASTM A572 Grade 50 specifies Nb, V which are not specified for AS/NZS 1594 HA350.
Can AS/NZS 1594 HA350 Be Substituted With ASTM A572 Grade 50?
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and ASTM A572 Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and ASTM A572 Grade 50?
ASTM A572 Grade 50 specifies Nb, V which are not specified for AS/NZS 1594 HA350.
Can AS/NZS 1594 HA350 be substituted with ASTM A572 Grade 50?
AS/NZS 1594 HA350 and ASTM A572 Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.