Related Material — 60.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 (AS/NZS 3678:2016) and ASTM A572 Grade 50 (ASTM A572) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 is typically used for refrigerated storage structures, cold climate construction, lng facility structural steel, antarctic research stations., while ASTM A572 Grade 50 is commonly used for high-strength low-alloy structural steel; buildings, bridges, transmission towers, construction equipment, general structural fabrication.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while ASTM A572 Grade 50 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 vs ASTM A572 Grade 50 is a 90.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 60.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
High-strength low-alloy structural steel; buildings, bridges, transmission towers, construction equipment, general structural fabrication
Key Differences
ASTM A572 Grade 50 specifies Nb, V which are not specified for AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0.
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 Be Substituted With ASTM A572 Grade 50?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 and ASTM A572 Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 and ASTM A572 Grade 50?
ASTM A572 Grade 50 specifies Nb, V which are not specified for AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0.
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 be substituted with ASTM A572 Grade 50?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350L0 and ASTM A572 Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.