ASTM A240/A240M S82012 vs EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6
Related Material — 68.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) and EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6 (EN 10088-1:2023) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A240/A240M S82012 vs EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6 is a 68.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 68.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A240/A240M S82012
EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6
Tensile Strength
>=700 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=500 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=35%
Not specified
Hardness
<=31 HRC
Not specified
Condition
t <= 0.187 in. [5.00 mm] (first condition printed); yield by 0.2 percent offset
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A240/A240M S82012
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6
Not documented
Key Differences
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S82012 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6?
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 and EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A240/A240M S82012 and EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6?
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S82012 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6?
ASTM A240/A240M S82012 and EN 10088-1 X3CrMnNiN20-9-6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.