Post Stock Login Register

ASTM A588 Grade A vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP

Minimal Match — 35% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

ASTM A588 Grade A (ASTM A588) and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP (EN 10025-5:2019) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) category. ASTM A588 Grade A is typically used for high-strength low-alloy structural steel with atmospheric corrosion resistance (weathering steel); bridges, transmission/communication towers, gusset plates, exposed structural applications, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is commonly used for high-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures. ASTM A588 Grade A is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.

As per chemical composition, ASTM A588 Grade A vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is a 65.1% match. As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%. Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.

Frequently Compared With ASTM A588 Grade A:
ASTM A588 CSA G40.21 50W JIS G3114 SMA400 CSA G40.21 260WT CSA G40.21 350A EN 10025-5 S355J2W EN 10025-5 S355J2WP AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR CSA G40.21 480A ASTM A709 Grade HPS 70W ASTM A588 Grade B EN 10025-5 S235J2W
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
65.1%
MECHANICAL MATCH
0%
OVERALL
35%
Specifications
Property ASTM A588 Grade A EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Standard ASTM A588 EN 10025-5:2019
Category Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering)
C (%) <=0.19 <=0.12
Mn (%) 0.80-1.25 <=1.0
Si (%) 0.30-0.65 <=0.75
P (%) <=0.040 0.06-0.15
S (%) <=0.050 <=0.035
Cu (%) 0.25-0.40 0.25-0.55
Cr (%) 0.40-0.65 0.30-1.25
Ni (%) <=0.40 Not specified
N (%) Not specified <=0.012
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property ASTM A588 Grade A EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Tensile Strength 485 MPa min 470-630 MPa
Yield Strength 345 MPa min >=355 MPa
Elongation 18% min >=22%
Hardness 140-190 HB Not specified
Condition Not specified Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks
Typical Applications
ASTM A588 Grade A
High-strength low-alloy structural steel with atmospheric corrosion resistance (weathering steel); bridges, transmission/communication towers, gusset plates, exposed structural applications
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
High-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures
Key Differences
Can ASTM A588 Grade A Be Substituted With EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
ASTM A588 Grade A and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
ASTM A588 Grade A
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2500–2700 mm (98.43–106.3 in)
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2900–4300 mm (114.17–169.29 in)
On M-EX Right Now
ASTM A588 Grade A
2 active listings and RFQs →
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
2 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ASTM A588 Grade A and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
ASTM A588 Grade A specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10025-5 S355J0WP. EN 10025-5 S355J0WP specifies N which is not specified for ASTM A588 Grade A.
Can ASTM A588 Grade A be substituted with EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
ASTM A588 Grade A and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.