Close Alternative — 78.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 635 (ASTM A959:2011) and ASTM A959 301 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 635 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while ASTM A959 301 is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
ASTM A959 635 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while ASTM A959 301 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 635 vs ASTM A959 301 is a 78.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 78.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 635
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
ASTM A959 301
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 635 specifies Al, Ti which are not specified for ASTM A959 301.
ASTM A959 301 specifies N which is not specified for ASTM A959 635.
Can ASTM A959 635 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 301?
ASTM A959 635 and ASTM A959 301 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 635 and ASTM A959 301?
ASTM A959 635 specifies Al, Ti which are not specified for ASTM A959 301. ASTM A959 301 specifies N which is not specified for ASTM A959 635.
Can ASTM A959 635 be substituted with ASTM A959 301?
ASTM A959 635 and ASTM A959 301 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.