Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S18235 (ASTM A959:2011) and BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 (BS 970 (Part 3):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S18235 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 is commonly used for bright cold finished bars (cold drawn, turned or precision ground) for general engineering purposes, in straight lengths; austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (table 18).
ASTM A959 S18235 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S18235 vs BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 is a 70.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S18235
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11
Bright cold finished bars (cold drawn, turned or precision ground) for general engineering purposes, in straight lengths; austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (Table 18)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 S18235 specifies N, Ti which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11.
Can ASTM A959 S18235 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11?
ASTM A959 S18235 and BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S18235 and BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11?
ASTM A959 S18235 specifies N, Ti which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11.
Can ASTM A959 S18235 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11?
ASTM A959 S18235 and BS 970 (Part 3) 316S11 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.