Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S32615 (ASTM A959:2011) and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S32615 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 is commonly used for austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (section five).
ASTM A959 S32615 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S32615 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 is a 72.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 S32615
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33
Condition
Not specified
Softened, 1000-1100 deg C
Tensile Strength
Not specified
510 MPa min
Yield Strength
Not specified
205 MPa min (0.2% proof)
Elongation
Not specified
40 % min
Hardness
Not specified
183 HB max
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S32615
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33
Austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (section five)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 S32615 specifies Cu which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33.
Can ASTM A959 S32615 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33?
ASTM A959 S32615 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S32615 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33?
ASTM A959 S32615 specifies Cu which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33.
Can ASTM A959 S32615 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33?
ASTM A959 S32615 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S33 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.