Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN3B (BS 970:1955) and BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 (BS 970 (Part 3):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
BS 970 EN3B is typically used for general engineering, cold forming, while BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 is commonly used for used for springs, blades, wear plates, hand tools, shafts, and cutting components..
BS 970 EN3B is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN3B vs BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 is a 84.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN3B
BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55
Tensile Strength
≥432 MPa (28 tons/sq in, converted)
Not specified
Elongation
≥17%
Not specified
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN3B
General engineering, cold forming
BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55
Used for springs, blades, wear plates, hand tools, shafts, and cutting components.
Can BS 970 EN3B Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55?
BS 970 EN3B and BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN3B and BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can BS 970 EN3B be substituted with BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55?
BS 970 EN3B and BS 970 (Part 3) 070M55 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.