Related Material — 69.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN48 (BS 970:1955) and IS 3195 60Cr4V2 (IS 3195:1992) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
BS 970 EN48 is typically used for high duty springs, valve springs, while IS 3195 60Cr4V2 is commonly used for volute and helical springs for railway rolling stock; flats and rounds, springs worked hot and heat-treated (clause 1.1, foreword).
BS 970 EN48 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 3195 60Cr4V2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN48 vs IS 3195 60Cr4V2 is a 69.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN48
IS 3195 60Cr4V2
Hardness, annealed
Not specified
<=255 HB
Hardness, untreated (hot rolled)
Not specified
about 310 HB (for guidance only)
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN48
High duty springs, valve springs
IS 3195 60Cr4V2
Volute and helical springs for railway rolling stock; flats and rounds, springs worked hot and heat-treated (clause 1.1, foreword)
Key Differences
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 specifies V which is not specified for BS 970 EN48.
Can BS 970 EN48 Be Substituted With IS 3195 60Cr4V2?
BS 970 EN48 and IS 3195 60Cr4V2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN48 and IS 3195 60Cr4V2?
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 specifies V which is not specified for BS 970 EN48.
Can BS 970 EN48 be substituted with IS 3195 60Cr4V2?
BS 970 EN48 and IS 3195 60Cr4V2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.