Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
CSA G40.21 350WT (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
CSA G40.21 350WT is typically used for bridges,offshore structures,heavy fabrication,pressure vessels,cranes,structural components, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
CSA G40.21 350WT is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, CSA G40.21 350WT vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 59.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 29.4%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
CSA G40.21 350WT
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
480-650 MPa
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
350 MPa min
>=310 MPa
Elongation
18-22 %
>=18%
Condition
Not specified
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies Si, N, Cr, Cu which are not specified for CSA G40.21 350WT.
Can CSA G40.21 350WT Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
CSA G40.21 350WT and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between CSA G40.21 350WT and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies Si, N, Cr, Cu which are not specified for CSA G40.21 350WT.
Can CSA G40.21 350WT be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
CSA G40.21 350WT and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.