Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
CSA G40.21 480W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) and AS/NZS 1595 C350 (AS/NZS 1595:1998) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
CSA G40.21 480W is typically used for heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment., while AS/NZS 1595 C350 is commonly used for cold-rolled structural steel sheet; roll-forming, cold-formed structural sections, purlins.
CSA G40.21 480W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada, while AS/NZS 1595 C350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, CSA G40.21 480W vs AS/NZS 1595 C350 is a 97.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
CSA G40.21 480W
AS/NZS 1595 C350
Yield Strength
480 MPa min
350 MPa min
Tensile Strength
590-790 MPa
430 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
14% min
Typical Applications
CSA G40.21 480W
Heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment.
Can CSA G40.21 480W Be Substituted With AS/NZS 1595 C350?
CSA G40.21 480W and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between CSA G40.21 480W and AS/NZS 1595 C350?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can CSA G40.21 480W be substituted with AS/NZS 1595 C350?
CSA G40.21 480W and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.