Minimal Match — 43% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 (DIN 17200:1986) and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is typically used for power generation components, rotors, turbine parts, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 64.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 43%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
900–1100 MPa
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
≥750 MPa
>=310 MPa
Elongation
≥13%
>=18%
Condition
Not specified
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Typical Applications
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9
Power generation components, rotors, turbine parts
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Flat products for pressure purposes
Key Differences
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 specifies V which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10.
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies Si, P, S, N which are not specified for DIN 17200 30CrMoV9.
Can DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 specifies V which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10. EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies Si, P, S, N which are not specified for DIN 17200 30CrMoV9.
Can DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
DIN 17200 30CrMoV9 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.