Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 (DIN 17200:1986) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, DIN 17200 30NiCr11 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 69.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 17200 30NiCr11
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
700 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
10-13%
Not specified
Hardness
260-320 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
DIN 17200 30NiCr11
Used in heavy-duty gears, crankshafts, aircraft parts, shafts, and connecting rods.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 specifies Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can DIN 17200 30NiCr11 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 specifies Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can DIN 17200 30NiCr11 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.