Close Alternative — 80.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-3 S420JR (EN 10025-3:2019) and EN 10025-2 S460JR (EN 10025-2:2019) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-3 S420JR is typically used for used in bridges, heavy machinery frames, structural beams, offshore structures, and crane components., while EN 10025-2 S460JR is commonly used for hot rolled products of structural steels.
EN 10025-3 S420JR is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-2 S460JR is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-3 S420JR vs EN 10025-2 S460JR is a 92.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 55%.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 80.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-3 S420JR
EN 10025-2 S460JR
Tensile Strength
520-680 MPa
550-720 MPa
Yield Strength
420 MPa min
>=460 MPa
Elongation
17% min
>=17%
Hardness
170-220 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Typical Applications
EN 10025-3 S420JR
Used in bridges, heavy machinery frames, structural beams, offshore structures, and crane components.
EN 10025-2 S460JR
Hot rolled products of structural steels
Key Differences
EN 10025-2 S460JR specifies Cu, Nb, V, Ti which are not specified for EN 10025-3 S420JR.
Can EN 10025-3 S420JR Be Substituted With EN 10025-2 S460JR?
EN 10025-3 S420JR and EN 10025-2 S460JR are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10025-3 S420JR and EN 10025-2 S460JR?
EN 10025-2 S460JR specifies Cu, Nb, V, Ti which are not specified for EN 10025-3 S420JR.
Can EN 10025-3 S420JR be substituted with EN 10025-2 S460JR?
EN 10025-3 S420JR and EN 10025-2 S460JR are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.