Post Stock Login Register

EN 10025-5 S235J2W vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP

Related Material — 56% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

EN 10025-5 S235J2W (EN 10025-5:2019) and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP (EN 10025-5:2019) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) category. EN 10025-5 S235J2W is typically used for weathering (atmospheric corrosion-resistant) structural steel; bridges, railway wagons, shipping containers, transmission towers, outdoor structures exposed without protective coating, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is commonly used for high-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures. EN 10025-5 S235J2W is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.

As per chemical composition, EN 10025-5 S235J2W vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is a 81.6% match. As per mechanical properties, the match is 4.9%. Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 56%.

Frequently Compared With EN 10025-5 S235J2W:
CSA G40.21 350A EN 10025-5 S355J2WP ASTM A588 EN 10025-5 S355J2W ASTM A588 Grade A CSA G40.21 260WT CSA G40.21 50W JIS G3114 SMA400 AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR ASTM A709 Grade HPS 70W ASTM A588 Grade B CSA G40.21 480A
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
81.6%
MECHANICAL MATCH
4.9%
OVERALL
56%
Specifications
Property EN 10025-5 S235J2W EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Standard EN 10025-5:2019 EN 10025-5:2019
Category Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering)
C (%) <=0.13 <=0.12
Si (%) <=0.40 <=0.75
Mn (%) 0.20-0.60 <=1.0
P (%) <=0.035 0.06-0.15
S (%) <=0.030 <=0.035
Cr (%) 0.40-0.80 0.30-1.25
Cu (%) 0.25-0.55 0.25-0.55
N (%) Not specified <=0.012
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property EN 10025-5 S235J2W EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Tensile Strength 360-510 MPa 470-630 MPa
Yield Strength >=235 MPa >=355 MPa
Elongation >=26% >=22%
Condition Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks
Typical Applications
EN 10025-5 S235J2W
Weathering (atmospheric corrosion-resistant) structural steel; bridges, railway wagons, shipping containers, transmission towers, outdoor structures exposed without protective coating
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
High-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures
Key Differences
Can EN 10025-5 S235J2W Be Substituted With EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
EN 10025-5 S235J2W and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
EN 10025-5 S235J2W
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2800–3600 mm (110.24–141.73 in)
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2900–4300 mm (114.17–169.29 in)
On M-EX Right Now
EN 10025-5 S235J2W
2 active listings and RFQs →
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
2 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between EN 10025-5 S235J2W and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP specifies N which is not specified for EN 10025-5 S235J2W.
Can EN 10025-5 S235J2W be substituted with EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
EN 10025-5 S235J2W and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.