Minimal Match — 31.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 (EN 10028-2:2017) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 is typically used for flat products for pressure purposes, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 47.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 31.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
590-750 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
>=470 MPa
400-600 MPa
Elongation
>=18%
10-14 %
Condition
Usual delivery condition quenched and tempered (+QT), nominal thickness up to 40 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 20MnMoNi4-5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.