EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 vs EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10
Related Material — 57.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 (EN 10028-2:2017) and EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 is typically used for flat products for pressure purposes, while EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 vs EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 is a 55.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 60%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 57.1%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1
EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10
Tensile Strength
580-760 MPa
600-780 MPa
Yield Strength
>=445 MPa
>=455 MPa
Elongation
>=18%
>=18%
Condition
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 60 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 60 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Typical Applications
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1
Flat products for pressure purposes
EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10
Flat products for pressure purposes
Key Differences
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 specifies Al which is not specified for EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10.
EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 specifies Ti, B, Ca which are not specified for EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1.
Can EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10?
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 and EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 and EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10?
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 specifies Al which is not specified for EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10. EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 specifies Ti, B, Ca which are not specified for EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1.
Can EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 be substituted with EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10?
EN 10028-2 X10CrMoVNb9-1 and EN 10028-2 12CrMoV12-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.