Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 (EN 10028-2:2017) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 is typically used for flat products for pressure purposes, while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 52.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
510-690 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
>=320 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=20%
Not specified
Condition
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 60 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.