Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 (EN 10028-2:2017) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 is typically used for flat products for pressure purposes, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 53% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
510-690 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
>=320 MPa
400-600 MPa
Elongation
>=20%
10-14 %
Condition
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 60 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 specifies N, Cu, Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
EN 10028-2 X12CrMo5 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.