Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 (EN 10083-1:1991) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 62.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Condition
Quenched and tempered, ruling section d <= 16 mm
Not specified
Elongation
10% min
Not specified
Hardness
Soft annealed: 248 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
1100 to 1300 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
900 MPa min
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4
Shafts, gears, high strength fasteners
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 specifies Mo, Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 specifies Mo, Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10083-1 36CrNiMo4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.