Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 (EN 10084:1998) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is a 58% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Tensile Strength
900-1200 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
750 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
9-12%
Not specified
Hardness
280-340 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6
Used in heavy-duty gears, pinions, drive shafts, transmission parts, and industrial gearboxes.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 specifies Ni, Mo, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 specifies Ni, Mo, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.