Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 (EN 10084:1998) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 is typically used for used in heavy-duty gears, pinions, drive shafts, transmission parts, and industrial gearboxes., while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 60.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 28.6%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
900-1200 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
750 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
9-12%
Not specified
Hardness
280-340 HB
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6
Used in heavy-duty gears, pinions, drive shafts, transmission parts, and industrial gearboxes.
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
EN 10084 17CrNiMo6 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.