EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 vs ASTM A276/A276M S20200
Close Alternative — 79.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 (EN 10088-1:2014) and ASTM A276/A276M S20200 (ASTM A276/A276M:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A276/A276M S20200 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 vs ASTM A276/A276M S20200 is a 79.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 79.4%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2
ASTM A276/A276M S20200
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=515 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=275 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=40%
Condition
Not specified
Condition A (Annealed), hot-finished or cold-finished, all sizes (first row printed)
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2
Not documented
ASTM A276/A276M S20200
Stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished)
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A276/A276M S20200.
Can EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 Be Substituted With ASTM A276/A276M S20200?
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and ASTM A276/A276M S20200 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and ASTM A276/A276M S20200?
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A276/A276M S20200.
Can EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 be substituted with ASTM A276/A276M S20200?
EN 10088-1 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and ASTM A276/A276M S20200 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.