Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 (EN 10088-1:2023) and ASTM A959 S30430 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 S30430 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 vs ASTM A959 S30430 is a 70.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20
Not documented
ASTM A959 S30430
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 specifies Al which is not specified for ASTM A959 S30430.
ASTM A959 S30430 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20.
Can EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 S30430?
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 and ASTM A959 S30430 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 and ASTM A959 S30430?
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 specifies Al which is not specified for ASTM A959 S30430. ASTM A959 S30430 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20.
Can EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 be substituted with ASTM A959 S30430?
EN 10088-1 X2NiCrAlTi32-20 and ASTM A959 S30430 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.