Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 (EN 10088-2:2014) and EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 vs EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17 is a 83.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12
EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17
Tensile Strength
380-560 MPa
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), cold rolled strip, up to 8 mm thick; Elongation is A80 (under 3 mm) or A (3 mm and over), longitudinal and transverse
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=210 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=25%
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17.
Can EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17?
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 and EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 and EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17?
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17.
Can EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17?
EN 10088-2 X2CrTi12 and EN 10088-1 X3CrTi17 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.