Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 (EN 10088-3:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 is typically used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is commonly used for cutlery, turbine blades, fasteners, surgical instruments.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 52.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 50%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Tensile Strength
750-900 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
>=650 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=18%
≥18%
Condition
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 160 mm; hardness for guidance only
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
36–45 (hardened)
Typical Applications
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 specifies P, S, Mo, Ti which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 specifies P, S, Mo, Ti which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoV13-5-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.