Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 (EN 10088-3:2014) and ASTM A959 316H (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 is typically used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products, while ASTM A959 316H is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 316H is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 vs ASTM A959 316H is a 70% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1
ASTM A959 316H
Tensile Strength
<=900 MPa
Not specified
Hardness
<=280 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, size range not stated; hardness for guidance only
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
ASTM A959 316H
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Can EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 316H?
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 and ASTM A959 316H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 and ASTM A959 316H?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 be substituted with ASTM A959 316H?
EN 10088-3 X39CrMo17-1 and ASTM A959 316H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.