Minimal Match — 51.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10089 50CrV4 (EN 10089:2002) and GB/T 1222 55CrMnA (GB/T 1222-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
EN 10089 50CrV4 is typically used for valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools, while GB/T 1222 55CrMnA is commonly used for automotive leaf springs, coil springs.
EN 10089 50CrV4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while GB/T 1222 55CrMnA is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China.
As per chemical composition, EN 10089 50CrV4 vs GB/T 1222 55CrMnA is a 77.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 51.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10089 50CrV4
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA
Tensile Strength
1100–1300 MPa
≥1225 MPa
Yield Strength
≥1000 MPa
≥1080 MPa
Elongation
≥8%
≥6%
Hardness
321–375 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10089 50CrV4
Valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA
Automotive leaf springs, coil springs
Key Differences
EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies V which is not specified for GB/T 1222 55CrMnA.
Can EN 10089 50CrV4 Be Substituted With GB/T 1222 55CrMnA?
EN 10089 50CrV4 and GB/T 1222 55CrMnA share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10089 50CrV4 and GB/T 1222 55CrMnA?
EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies V which is not specified for GB/T 1222 55CrMnA.
Can EN 10089 50CrV4 be substituted with GB/T 1222 55CrMnA?
EN 10089 50CrV4 and GB/T 1222 55CrMnA share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.