Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 1299 CrWMn (GB/T 1299-2014) and AISI 52100 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GB/T 1299 CrWMn is typically used for used for dies, thread rolling tools, punches, gauges, woodworking cutters, and measuring instruments., while AISI 52100 is commonly used for anti-friction bearings, ball screws, precision rollers.
GB/T 1299 CrWMn is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while AISI 52100 is defined under AISI, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 1299 CrWMn vs AISI 52100 is a 74.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 1299 CrWMn
AISI 52100
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
≥620 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
700-900 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
8-12%
Not specified
Hardness
60-64 HRC
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
60–66 (hardened)
Hardness HB
Not specified
179–229 (annealed)
Typical Applications
GB/T 1299 CrWMn
Used for dies, thread rolling tools, punches, gauges, woodworking cutters, and measuring instruments.
GB/T 1299 CrWMn specifies W which is not specified for AISI 52100.
Can GB/T 1299 CrWMn Be Substituted With AISI 52100?
GB/T 1299 CrWMn and AISI 52100 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 1299 CrWMn and AISI 52100?
GB/T 1299 CrWMn specifies W which is not specified for AISI 52100.
Can GB/T 1299 CrWMn be substituted with AISI 52100?
GB/T 1299 CrWMn and AISI 52100 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.