Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 1299 T10 (GB/T 1299-2014) and IS 4367 36Si7 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
GB/T 1299 T10 is classified under Tool & Die Steels, while IS 4367 36Si7 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
GB/T 1299 T10 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 4367 36Si7 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 1299 T10 vs IS 4367 36Si7 is a 80.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 37.5%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 1299 T10
IS 4367 36Si7
Tensile Strength
750-950 MPa
800-950 MPa
Yield Strength
500-700 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
8-12%
Not specified
Hardness
60-65 HRC
235-280 HB
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=217 HB
Condition
Not specified
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 100 mm
Typical Applications
GB/T 1299 T10
Used for chisels, files, hand saws, drills, woodworking tools, and cold shearing blades.
IS 4367 36Si7
Not documented
Key Differences
Different category: GB/T 1299 T10 is Tool & Die Steels, IS 4367 36Si7 is Alloy Steel.
Can GB/T 1299 T10 Be Substituted With IS 4367 36Si7?
GB/T 1299 T10 and IS 4367 36Si7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 1299 T10 and IS 4367 36Si7?
Different category: GB/T 1299 T10 is Tool & Die Steels, IS 4367 36Si7 is Alloy Steel.
Can GB/T 1299 T10 be substituted with IS 4367 36Si7?
GB/T 1299 T10 and IS 4367 36Si7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.